craiggum
craiggum

Forced to the floor

Views

2990

Likes

Awards

Featured
Peer Award
Superb Composition
AnkarloAdventures burnielot designpictures Dior_22 jusi18 christianmadsen jeanjduncan +43
Absolute Masterpiece
PORNrasanaga leolion69 Arvidz MubashirPress7 GreenCopperz eugenekutuzoff mcdougaj +35
Outstanding Creativity
DanielJPhotography ToniHollowayPullum RobSartin davidpcherniak trune66 BrunoHeeb tephiphotography +30
Top Choice
ramonquintanajolonch Danbwr idFoto Thomas_Knox Hov1s fabiotorresan Andreas_Voigt +21
All Star
michaellybbert Alamo8808 Jennifer-Wagner-Amos DaveLoucks
Superior Skill
Lotofphotography kagebaker Myowndsign waldomalan
Magnificent Capture
steveyancey OttoSearan Stevenhendricksphotog

Emotions

Impressed
MQSVM

Top ClassTM

Anything People Photo ContestTop 10 class
Anything People Photo ContestTop 10 class week 1

Categories


3 Comments | Report
Vash01Photo PRO
 
Vash01Photo December 18, 2015
This should have 'Adult Content' on it.
Shilah
Shilah December 20, 2015
Why? it is a human body, it is not vulgar, it is a beautiful composition, and there is nothing sexual about it!
Crazy_Jester_Images PRO+
 
Crazy_Jester_Images December 24, 2015
i dont see any nudity or sexual content -- its a beautiful pic
allanthemofmanhamilton
 
allanthemofmanhamilton January 17, 2016
I too have to disagree that this should be labelled "Adult Content"; here's why.

The nudity does not show explicit sexuality as in hardcore pornography. For some, this could be softcore ("erotica") but it barely makes it at that because sexuality still isn't overt which suggests that a deliberate aim to inspire libidinous thought is not a priority.

This is largely a study of form; therefore, a fine art nude:

https://themofman.wordpress.com/viewpoint/mof-on-nudity-in-photography/